Misleading Endorsements Result in $250,000 Payment to FTC

March 22nd, 2011

In the Matter of Legacy Learning Systems, Inc. confirms that online marketers are at risk of paying when in violation of the Federal Trade Commision’s (FTC) Part 255 Guidelines are not followed.  An online marketer has agreed to pay $250,000 after misrepresenting that reviews of its DVDs, which it sold and allowed affiliates to market on its behalf, were independent.  Affiliates had actually been paid commissions for the reviews of the products.

The FTC filed a complaint saying that the online marketer had disseminated or caused to be disseminated advertisements touting reviews as “independent” when in fact they were provided by endorsers who “receives financial compensation from the sale of [the online marketer's] products.”  The FTC did not take kindly to the online marketer’s failure to “implement a reasonable monitoring program to ensure that [its] affiliates clearly and prominently disclose their relationship.”  Despite the online marketer’s affiliate agreement requiring compliance with the FTC’s testimonial and endorsement guidelines, the FTC focused on the online marketer’s failure to enforce the provision against those affiliates that violated the terms.

A March 21, 2011 Federal Register notice summarized as follows: “The consent agreement in this matter settled alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition.”  The online marketer must now monitor its affiliates, the affiliates that generate the online marketer significant sums of money.

While this FTC enforcement action was against the online marketer, it does not mean that the FTC will not pursue action against online marketers and affiliates alike in the future.  Both have a duty to be truthful, disclose material relationships, and be able to substantiate the same.

Glenn Beck Blatantly Violates FTC New Endorsement Guidelines under 16 CFR Part 255

December 15th, 2009

The Federal Trade Commission has adopted new guidelines concerning the use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising which took effect December 1, 2009. Apparently, Glenn Beck didn’t get the memo. Mr. Beck regularly uses his seat as an entertainer on FOX News to tell viewers they should implement the “three G System” of “god, gold and guns.” At the same time, he is an on air promotion and testimonial advertiser for Goldline International, a precious medal vendor.

You can find more information about Glenn Beck’s on air promotions at this link “Glenn Beck, Astroturfing for Gold?”. You can view the video wherein he clearly violates Part 255 endorsement disclosure requirements below:

Glenn Beck, Astroturfing for Gold?

It should also be noted that FOX News is required to monitor its on air personalities for compliance with 16 CFR Part 255 and is also potentially liable. Fines for violating the new rule are up to $11,000.00 per incident. It is unclear how many inappropriate endorsements have occurred on FOX News to date.

If you have a question concerning compliance with FTC endorsement guideline 16 CFR Part 255, contact one of our experienced advertising attorneys today for a free consultation or call toll free 866-936-7447.

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan